My wifey had this major desire to watch a spooky movie last night, so I had no choice but to watch The Shining with her. Now I’ve never really liked The Shining much (I think Stanley Kubrick is an incredibly overrated director), mainly because those two spooky twins scare the crap out of me.
But last night, I realized that there were even more annoying things than the creepy little girls.
1. Jack Torrance’s Mace Windu-like character growth

“You’re referring to the prophecy of the one who will bring balance to the Overlook Hotel. You believe it’s this boy?”
I’ve never read the book or anything, but I know that in the book, Jack was a regular guy with some issues, who gradually descends into madness at the hotel. Kinda sympathetic like that, really.
But noooooooo, you can’t have a sympathetic character in a Stanley Kubrick movie. That’s not how Kubrick rolls! In the movie, Jack was a crazy psycho who eventually becomes… more psychotic. Wow, what a great and unsuspected character arc!
Jack Torrance has about as much growth or development as Mace Windu, so that you half-expect him to try to kill his family with a purple lightsaber at the end of the movie. I’m not saying that you need some kinda M Night Shylamananlam plot twist at the end, but seriously, try not to reveal the rest of the movie in the first five minutes!
2. The soundtrack
Since it’s a movie that the wifey and I have both watched a few times before, we were actually Photoshopping while it was playing in the background. As such, the soundtrack hit me in a way I’ve never noticed before. It was loud, irritating, and just kinda stupid (kinda like Internet forum trolls).
You know that ringing sound that you hear when someone smacks the side of your head with a skateboard? Well, the soundtrack of this movie is like having someone repeatedly swing their skateboard into your ear for 2 hours. It’s just endless high-pitched ringing and sudden gongs and shit.
Scatman explaining the shining to Danny? Ringing sound. Walking around the hotel? Ringing sound. Always with the ringing sound!
And it’s not just the “creepy” parts either. That entire opening sequence where they drive up to the hotel? Loud irritating random sounds all the way. For this part, it’s like if Trent Reznor got incredibly doped up and went into convulsions on top of his synthesizer.
3. Danny’s Redrum voice
Wow. I mean, that part towards the end where he does the croaky voice and repeats “redrum” for about five minutes straight? That’s a small slice of Hell right there.
4. Shelley Duvall’s character
Okay, like seriously… how irritating was she? I mean she’s just so incredibly stupid. In most horror movies, she’d be the irritating character whose death you most want to see (except in this movie, she survives to the end).
She goes around the whole movie just saying dumb things and irritating not only Jack, but the viewer as well; you’d swear that it was Tom Greene in a wig.
And the worst part is towards the end – after Jack Nicholson goes apeshit and tries to kill everyone, she knocks him out with a baseball bat and locks him into the kitchen pantry. Smart move, but a regular person would then try to get the hell outta there, but not this woman. She goes back to her room and sleeps, waking up only when Jack comes back with an axe.
I looked it up, and it seemed like Duvall actually hated working with Kubrick and they frequently argued about her character and acting techniques. Hell, if someone wanted me to act like a complete dumbass, I’d kick up a fuss too.
5. People reading bullshit into the story
Look it up on the Internet and there’s a million different “explanations” on why the movie is all weird as it is, reading bullshit into the story as if it’s a freakin’ Shakespearean play. There’s theories that it’s based on the White Man beating down on Native Americans, that it’s based on the Holocaust, or Hansel and Gretel.
Just because Kubrick has the chef die over a rug that’s got an Indian motif, or that the hotel is built over an Indian burial ground, doesn’t mean he’s making some kinda social statement. He probably just thought it’d look cool… like blood pouring out of an elevator. You can imagine Kubrick standing at the set like Beavis going “Indian motifs and blood from an elevator are cool! Heh heh heh heh heh!”

“Heh heh heh… Indian motifs are cool!” “Yeah, and then blood pours out from the elevator. Huh huh huh!”
This doesn’t really have anything to do with the movie exactly, but it kinda just makes me dislike it more.
Random Fact: The Shining is the only Kubrick film since the mid 1950′s not to get a nomination for a Golden Globe or Oscar. Instead, it got nominated for Worst Director and Worst Actress at the Razzies. Yep, the same type of awards that Madonna and movies like Gigli repeatedly get nominated for.

February 4th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
they killed Jazz in this movie too =(
February 5th, 2010 at 8:58 am
Yeah. I mean… Eyes Wide Shut, even Full Metal Jacket are just movies that bore me big time.
April 16th, 2010 at 11:03 am
I’ve watched this movie for the first time today. And ever since, I’ve been googling for “the shining sucks”, to try and find posts like this, just to agree with them, and share my own thoughts:
THE SHINING SUCKS MONKEY ASS.
Alright, that felt good.
April 16th, 2010 at 11:32 am
Hahaha good for you! Fuck all those Kubrick bandwagon fanboys.
May 10th, 2010 at 2:41 pm
sorry i don’t have an avatar! just happened upon the site randomly. but i COMPLETELY agree. kubrick is as overrated as they come. while i did enjoy a clockwork orange, everything else he’s done has been utter shit. does he have absolutely no idea what a three-act structure is, or is he just trying to be “artsy” and buck the trends. either way, his story-telling technique, above all, drives me absolutely up the wall. props for standing up for the truth, drew.
May 10th, 2010 at 4:52 pm
That’s okay, Ben. You don’t need an avatar to rant about the Shining. You’ve got something better than a cool avatar: you’ve got valid points about how much this movie lacks a structure.
September 28th, 2010 at 9:55 am
You’re right Drew, there is no meaning to this movie. I actually asked Jan Harlan about if after a recent 35mm screening, and he said it was “nonsense and didn’t mean anything. It’s a fantasy, nothing more. Stanley and I always agreed that you should never try to explain a film that you don’t understand yourself: one of the reasons he never gave interviews”!!! That pretty much says it all. People who read things into this film and follow it like some kind of religion is fine, but I don’t agree, especially after hearing the above.
October 1st, 2010 at 10:10 am
I didn’t realize that Kubrick never gave interviews for this movie… I guess that anecdote sheds a whole lot of light on this matter!
July 11th, 2012 at 6:15 pm
I’m watching it for the first time right now, and yeah, the wife is intolerable. She’s a complete motor character, only there to drive the plot. And yeah, Jack’s character dev is totally lacking. There’s no illustration of him going mad..it’s all just rather sudden.
Meaning to the film? The film is based on a King novel. Any meaning it has would have to be found in the source material. I think King would say that it has no meaning other than to entertain.
July 12th, 2012 at 8:44 am
Well King hated the film, and the casting of Jack Nicholson. I think he mostly hated it cos the whole semi-autobiographical subplot of the main character’s alcoholism was downplayed in the film, and well… Jack was a psycho to begin with.
July 12th, 2012 at 9:06 am
Yeah. Personally, I think Nicholson is the only thing that saved the film. I can’t imagine anyone else in the role. I also think that the lady who played the wife did what she could with the material she was given. She did “terrified” very well, imo. It’s just a shame that her character was so 1dimensional and stupid.
Like most horror films, stupidity drives the plot here.
I also thought it crude of them to use the “n” word. I don’t know if it was just expected in 1980 (I was born in 84..so idk) or if they did it for shock value.
All in all, I don’t hate the film, but it could have been A LOT better.
July 12th, 2012 at 9:21 am
There has been a couple of remakes over the years, including one that King directed himself. I haven’t seen them, but I did read that they”re a lot worse than Kubrick’s version.
July 12th, 2012 at 2:07 pm
Interesting. I think I’ll find the one that King directed. I’m willing to bet that it’s better than this one. Movie critics are very hard to please, and if they already liked the first film, they would have even higher expectations.
I think I’ll read the novel now. I like King’s work, but for some reason I couldn’t get in to the novel when I tried it years ago. Regardless, it has to be many levels deeper than the film, and I’d like to know more about the protagonist’s character.
November 17th, 2012 at 8:53 pm
I bought it on DVD, watched it and no doubt it was a put down, Jack Nicholson was the only good actor, it had irritating and awkward moments, it made no sense and it got boring after a while
November 18th, 2012 at 12:43 pm
I’m glad I’m not the only one that feels this way. The strongest memory I have (aside from the two creepy girls) is the irritating whining soundtrack.
May 9th, 2013 at 12:03 am
It’s not a spooky film, it’s not a horror film. It’s a Kubrick film playing w/ the genre of horror. It’s dated, yes, like most films from 30 years ago. Acting has also changed since 30 years ago. There’s no hidden meanings: it’s a visual experiment, somehow, following Kubrick’s obsession with ‘vision’ throughout all his films. Yes, it’s artsy. So what? Then it should be read as an ‘art film’ – not as a mainstream horror film. If you were looking for a mainstream horror film, you shouldn’t watch The Shining.
May 9th, 2013 at 4:17 pm
I think the point I was trying to make is more like “If I was looking for an enjoyable movie, then I shouldn’t watch The Shining.” I wasn’t disappointed in it as a mainstream horror movie, or a horror movie in general… I just feel it’s a highly overrated movie and well, I think it sucks.
May 12th, 2013 at 1:34 am
I agree. I watched it last night and I found it more like a comedy than a horror movie. I also found it a little boring. My friend who watched it with me fell asleep halfway through the movie